Sudan’s Bashir defies the ICC

The African Union has appointed Thabo Mbeki as an intermediary between the International Criminal Court and Sudan. The former South African leader will chair a committee to investigate human rights violations in Darfur in response to the ICC arrest warrant for Sudan’s President Omar al-Bashir. 300,000 people have died and two million others have been displaced in Darfur however the Sudanese dictator has rejected the charges and accused the court of being a colonial tool. The warrant is the first issued by the court to a reigning head of state.

The ICC said his official capacity does not exclude criminal responsibility or grant him immunity. On Tuesday the court issued the warrant “for war crimes and crimes against humanity.” The arraignment is on 10 counts; three of genocide, five of crimes against humanity and two of war crimes. The ICC accused Bashir of criminal responsibility for intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population of Darfur over five years (2003-2008) and for “murdering, exterminating, raping, torturing and forcibly transferring large numbers of civilians, and pillaging their property.”

The most powerful Darfuri rebel group, the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM), welcomed the announcement. Its leader Ibrahim Khalil said the ruling invalidated Bashir’s legitimacy. He told Al Jazeera the warrant would “create huge transformation” in Sudan. Khalil expects Bashir will refuse to attend the trial and hinted JEM might carry out the arrest warrant. “They say the ICC does not have a mechanism to arrest him [Al-Bashir],” he said. “But we say JEM has its own great and powerful mechanism.”

The announcement brought a hostile response in Khartoum. The government arranged an impromptu anti-ICC rally where Bashir said Sudan was a target of Western powers and the ICC was a tool of colonialists after Sudan’s oil. He revoked the licences of six aid groups working in the country include Oxfam, Medecins Sans Frontieres and Save The Children. MSF said it was absurd impartial organisations were caught up in a political and judicial process. Sudanese officials also threatened witnesses who co-operated with the ICC. The head of Sudan’s security service warned: “We will sever the limbs of those who attempt to stick their hands in to execute the [court’s] plans.”

Some sympathetic Darfur watchers also have misgivings about the indictment. British writer and expert on African issues, Alex de Waal, called it a sad day for Sudan. He called the indictment a “roll of the dice, a gamble with unknown consequences”. He said the Sudanese problem required delicate negotiation and compromise between the diverse stakeholders. He says the ICC undermined this process by being a “human rights absolutism that demands that some people be ruled out entirely”. He said the Sudanese government would ignore the indictment, and the West would have no leverage in the country, short of invading it.

The International Crisis Group is more hopeful, though it admits there is little likelihood of Bashir resigning. The ICG says the status quo is unsustainable in the long term and believes some senior members of the ruling National Congress Party are unhappy with Bashir’s policy of confrontation with Sudan’s peripheral regions (Darfur, Kordofan, Eastern and Southern Sudan). “To preserve its economic interests and guarantee its survival,” the ICG says, “the NCP is likely to look for a way out of a situation, by changing its policies or leadership.”

The new US president will also have a role to play if it revisits the hostile American position to the ICC. The US is the only Western power not among the ICC’s 108 member nations. The Save Darfur Coalition urged the Obama administration to take advantage of a “new window of opportunity for peace” in Sudan. But the response has been equivocal. Obama press secretary Robert Gibbs refused to specifically support the warrant on Thursday merely saying “the White House believes that those who have committed atrocities should be held accountable; that as this process moves forward, that we would urge restraint on the part of all parties.” Gibbs and his boss know that until the US joins the ICC, it can’t afford to put its mouth where its money might not be.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s