Rasmussen primes the world for Afghanistan military surge

As Afghanistan counts down to its presidential election on Thursday, NATO’s new Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen claimed the country could become the “grand central station of international terrorism.” Rasmussen said NATO would support the Afghan people for “as long as it takes” and called on “anyone who believes in basic human rights” to support the mission. While the former Danish right-wing Prime Minister’s terror claim should be treated with caution, Taliban forces did their bit to help his cause by ramping up attacks on military and civilian targets in an effort to discredit the election. (photo credit: Soldiers Military Centre)

Eight years after the US invaded Afghanistan, the country is awash with suicide bombers, AIDS victims and a resurgent Taliban. Drug barons run the country that produces 90 percent of the world’s heroin. There are over 100,000 multinational forces in Afghanistan under NATO and American command. Casualties have increased markedly since February and 75 foreign soldiers were killed in July. General Stanley McChrystal, the US commander of NATO forces in Afghanistan is asking member countries for a significant increase in international troop numbers.

Yesterday US President Obama reaffirmed his commitment to wind down US operations in Iraq and re-focus efforts in Afghanistan. America has 62,000 troops in the country and will deploy another 6,000 by the end of the year. As Terence O’Brien wrote in the May/June edition of the US Foreign Policy journal, Afghanistan has forbidding problems that make it a bigger challenge than Iraq. These include the country’s size, rugged geography, poverty, ethnic diversity, mistrust of centralised government, cross-border sanctuaries and its opium economy, plus the tenacity of the Taliban and other insurgent groups.

In March, Obama admitted America was not winning the war and dialogue with moderate elements of the Taliban ‘should be explored’. “Part of the success in Iraq involved reaching out to people that we would consider to be Islamic fundamentalists, but who were willing to work with us,” he said. President Hamid Karzai appointed his brother Qayim as envoy to the Taliban. Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed Omar reportedly approved peace negotiations but recent activity suggests positions have hardened. The Guardian reports overnight a rocket struck the presidential palace in Kabul and a second hit police headquarters.

The Taliban is strongest in the south, particularly in the provinces of Helmand, Kandahar and Uruzgan (where Australian forces are stationed). The west is not winning the battle of hearts and minds in these areas. Jan Forrester says the Afghan rumour mill tells people of increasing number of civilians wrongly targetted and killed. Many locals now believe foreigners are in Afghanistan just to promote their own interests, she says.

What Australian interests are in Afghanistan have never been properly explained by the Howard or Rudd Governments other than vague threats of terror. However, Australian Major Mick Bassingthwaighte has given an intriguing insight into operational matters in a recent edition of the Australian Army Journal. Bassingthwaighte commanded a Security Task Group in Afghanistan in 2007 and 2008. In an article called “Taking tactics from the Taliban” he says the fight against the Taliban is run according to the following principles drawn from previous wars in the region:
– Limited and poor condition access roads to narrow valleys make it difficult to use conventional motorised forces
– Afghans are aware of psych op campaigns and are easily alienated if promised action does not arise,
– individual Afghans change sides at whim,
– most ambushes occur on the way back to base camps,
– helicopter support is crucial to preventing such ambushes, and
– it is “a platoon leaders’ war” of engaging small forces which will only fight when the terrain and circumstances are favourable.

None of these principals look like changing any time soon. Without an exit strategy, Australia and the other nations of Rasmussen’s coalition could be waiting a long time for a train to get them out of Afghanistan’s “grand central station”.


One thought on “Rasmussen primes the world for Afghanistan military surge

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s