The Internet Industry Association has made an application to become “friend of the court” in an upcoming legal battle between copyright groups and an ISP over illegal downloading. The APC said this civil action could “shut down the Internet” and the outcome could have significant ramifications for Internet usage in Australia. The industry body Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft is alleging the ISP iiNet infringed copyright by not preventing customers from downloading pirated material. Because of the potential knock-on effects, the IIA, which represents the wider Internet community as well as ISPs, has applied to be amicus curiae, a ‘friend of the court’. Though yet to make a submission, AFACT has opposed the request because it thinks the IIA will be biased to its member iiNet. (photo by Harry CC BY 2.0)
Copyright owners cannot directly identify infringers but can identify IP addresses. Once identified, they send infringement notices to providers. Australia does not have blanket agreement between content companies and broadband providers about file swapping. While ISPs such as Optus forward infringement notices to customers, others like Telstra ignore them completely. According to Malone, iiNet is in the active camp and passes along each complaint to state police. He says what AFACT wants his company to do is impossible. They cannot act on allegations against customers. “AFACT seems to expect ISPs to be judge, jury and executioner here”, said Malone. “We are meant to take their unfounded allegation, then cut customers off.”
Digital media academic Tama Leaver says the case will test the safe harbour provisions brought in during the recent Free Trade Agreement with the US. The provision provides some immunity for ISPs when providing carriage services. The law limits remedies to infringements when transmitting, hosting, caching or referencing information according to Division 2AA of the amended 1968 Copyright Act. AFACT are claiming iiNet are in breach of sections 115 and 116 of the Act (immediately prior to Division 2AA in the Act) which deal with infringement of copyright.
AFACT is the film industry’s enforcer to act on piracy claims. According to its website, its members include Village Roadshow, Walt Disney, Paramount, Sony, News Corp (20th century Fox) Universal and Warner Bros. All these companies are listed as plaintiffs in the matter alongside the Seven Network. They have asked the court to order the iiNet to act to prevent the continuing unauthorised use of their material by customers. It says piracy results in lost jobs, and limits investment in new programs and films, as well as in new technologies which benefit consumers. The presiding judge will make a decision on the IIA’s amicus curiae application in the coming weeks. The Federal Court trial will commence 6 October. This case is worth following because of how it might affect the copyright law faultline between the rights and benefits of authorship and the general public’s right to enjoy created products.