The government asked Greenhill Caliburn to review the corporate plan and provide a commercial assessment, identifying and analysing the plan’s key assumptions and potential risks. The company released its executive summary of the review today.
The government asked Greenhill Caliburn to review NBN Co Limited’s Corporate Plan and provide a commercial assessment, identifying and analysing the plan’s key assumptions and potential risks. Greenhill Caliburn is listed in the New York Stock Exchange and specialises in financial and strategic advice. Their baseline position having reviewed the plan was “taken as a whole, the Corporate Plan for the development of the NBN is reasonable.” They said key assumptions underlying revenue and cost projections appeared be in line with domestic and international benchmarks, and were consistent with the government’s policy objectives for the NBN.The key assumptions in the plan are network design, regulatory considerations and completion of agreements with third parties. Variations could affect NBN Co’s business strategy and return profile. NBN Co’s long term revenue forecast contain “inherent uncertainties” and are subject to shifting technologies and consumer preferences. The review did not conduct an in-depth analysis of NBN Co’s future funding requirements. Greenhill said NBN Co could get debt funding with government support.
The Corporate Plan provides a detailed overview of the expected development and operation of the NBN, including a 30-year business forecast. The principle objectives are providing 93 per cent fibre network coverage by the end of 2020, delivering a wholesale-only open access platform, and providing an entry-level mass market product peak information rate of 12 Mbps with the potential to deliver up to 1 Gbps in the future. Government decisions affecting the NBN include the increase of points of interconnect to premises from 14 to 120 and new requirements for greenfield developments.
A decision needs to be made to stop market participants from “cherry picking” commercially attractive areas ahead of the NBN build. More legislation is required to grant powers and immunities to builders rolling out overhead cabling, as well as greenfields legislation to mandate corporate developers install fibre-ready equipment. They also want to see how the agreements with Telstra hatched out in June last year pan out.
The Corporate Plan estimates it will cost $35.9 billion to build the NBN fibre network and total funding requirements will be $37.1 billion. To generate revenues to repay this high build price, it is critical a high number of users are attracted to and retained on the NBN. A total of 13 million homes, schools and workplaces will be connected by 2020. They will also need higher value products and services with no budget overruns. Trends towards “mobile centric” broadband networks and consumer pushback on the usage-based pricing model could have negative impact. Greenhill Caliburn recommended a close monitoring of the Telstra customer migration and initial release phases relative to plan and the establishment of NBN Co monitoring arrangements particularly when key decisions are made.
The Opposition said the Greenhill report backs up their arguments against the NBN. Shadow Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull said the report’s support for the NBN was “grudging” and lacked answers for a range of critical questions. “This report, like the other multi-million dollar consultants’ reports the Government has commissioned, fails to address the single most important issue,” said Turnbull. “What is the most cost-effective way to ensure that all Australians have access to high speed and affordable broadband?” Conroy’s response is the plan showed taxpayers would get their investment back, with a return. “The NBN will provide a rate of return significantly higher than the government bond rate and all Australians will gain access to this world class network,” he said.